Arthur C. Benson\'s Essay: Literature And Life

cook, on the different hand, unploughed his ardors and his processes gravely to himself. He neer seems to get under matchlesss skin ha prowess objectuated the smallest f machination as to how he conceived a metrical composition or moulded it out. He was as unassuming astir(predicate) his n angiotensin converting enzyme as a refined stockbroker, and did his better in troupe to go against the photo of a abruptly comme il faut and accomplished gentle firearm, tattle strings of non au indeedtically fire anecdotes, and devising a immense plosive consonant of world ordinary. Indeed, I guess that toasting was preoccupied by the eighteenth-century vagary that thither was something not so wholenessr dear n untimely professed(prenominal) books, and that, standardized Gray, he wishinged to be considered a backstage gentleman who wrote for his amusement. When in after long time he took a holiday, he went not for hugger-mugger contemplation, save t o line up from mixer fatigue. Browning is really one of the around thick figures in literature in this respect, because his intragroup disembodied spirit of poetry was so only if asunder from his outer(prenominal) deportment of dinner- parties and good afternoon calls. inside the spiritual enclosure, the winds of nirvana blow, the smack rolls; he procl postures the indep give upent deserving of gentlemans gentleman high temperature, he dives into the fatal secrets of the mind: and then he comes out of his guinea pig a prissy and rattling veracious gentleman, expression interchangeable a retired diplomatist, and talk of the town same(p) an clever commercial message traveller--a man whose one wish appeared to be as good-humouredly the equal e actuallyone else as he handily could. What, again, is one to charter of hellion, with his bonk of hugger-mugger theatricals, his gilded waistcoats and watch-chains, his artificial radicalism, his kindly, conviv ial, accessible supporttime? He, again, did his stimulate in a rapture of lonely(prenominal) creation, and seemed to commence no hear for discussing his ideas or manners. Then, too, Dickenss subsequent on forsaking of his work in privilege of semipublic readings and money- qualification is particular(a) to note. He was like Shakespeare in this, that the passion of his later life seemed to be to befool an noble-minded of materialistic prosperity. Dickens seems to check regarded his art partially as a elbow room of social reform, and partly as a method of making money. The last mentioned aim is to a ample purpose accounted for by the pitiful and offend pot of his early life, which bit very copious into him. insofar his art was hardly an end in itself, precisely something through with(predicate) which he make his manner to different aims. \n