An Insight into Academic Writing Essay

Authors Gerald Graff and Cathy Berkenstein claim in their book, They Say, I Say, that academic piece of music is not about playing it safe and pot up truths and bits of knowledge, kindred many mountain assume. Rather, it is about the dynamic interaction in the midst of other peoples points of pick up and the authors response to those perspectives. In chapter one of Graff and Berkensteins book they evince the necessity of balance when implementing certain make-up moves, specifically, when introducing a counter-view, summarizing others agate lines, and when quoting person elses words.Graff and Berkenstein contend that by fountain an argument with an explanation of what the thesis is responding tointroducing a counter-viewgives the main point clarity and relevance. They uphold stating the oppose view or trust initially so that it will delineate and explain what the thesis is addressing. But, they also circumspection the source not to bloat their fundament with extraneou s information for fear of losing the audiences focus and engagement. What Graff and Berkenstein suggest, so, is that as presently as possible you state your witness position and the one its responding to together, and that you look of the two as a unit. Basically, they assert that the trump way to give a genuine response to others views during academic writing is to excite a balance among introducing what They Say (the opposing point of view) and what I Say (the writers response). If being in a constant dialogue with others positions is essential to capabilityion persuasively, as Graff and Berkenstein claim, then summarizing others arguments is of import to the writers arsenal of basic moves. All as well often during a summary, writers will yield their own opinions on an words topic rather than revealing what the article is actually stating.On the opposite extreme, on that point are the writers who do nothing just summarize, which dilutes their own views in an ocean of soul elses ideas. Graff and Berkenstein remind us that a good summary requires balancing what the pilot film author is saying with the writers own focus. In other words, an prodigious summary contains the perspective of the original author, tour emphasizing the points the responding author wants to address. One of the best ways to initiate an effective argument is not only to summarize what they say, except to quote their exact words.According to Graff and Berkenstein, Quoting somebody elses words gives a grand amount of credibility to your summary and helps encounter that it is fair and accurate. By quoting someone elses exact statement it serves as a proof of evidence that you are not just fabricating anothers claim, yet that you are disclosing their true ideas. Like introducing a counter-view and summarizing, quoting requires that you find an ideal balance between the quantity of quotes and content of commentary.A greens issue with quoting is when the author assume s the quote speaks for itself. As Graff and Berkenstein, quotes are like literary orphans that have been taken from their original context, they need to be integrated into their new textual surroundings. In simpler terms, a quote needs to be introduced, interpreted, and then connected to the central idea. I found chapter one of Graff and Berkensteins book, They Say, to be extremely interesting and useful. The way they buttoned all their information to a central idea, while explaining how to do just that transfixed me.I felt like their writing had a constant flow from cosmos of a move, to implementing balance, to common problems, how to fix those problems, and then to exercises that would reinforce their primary concepts. Their style and content kept me engaged and focused. Also, I versed a handful of writing tactics, like introducing a counter-view, summarizing, and inserting quotes, that I was not one-hundred part sure on how to do antecedent to the reading. Overall, I found the chapter to be engaging, informative, and unspoiled to me and my writing style.