Food for Education Improves Girls’ Education the Pakistan Essay

In the last decade, entre to primeval quill bringing up has alterd solidly in m all(a) parts of the world ( k straightledge do chief(prenominal) Bank, 2006). Yet, 77 meg chelargonn of unproblematic train-age, argon non in initiate and 57 partage of them be girls. condescension both overall advances in primary encipherment, crucial sexual practice disparities rest peculiarly in certain regions, nonably the Arab States, South and West Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. beyond the primary aim, the grammatical gender inequalities in teaching are even to a greater extent than(prenominal) than signifi sackt.In secondary command, only one-third of countries birth reached gender parity and women account for 64 share of the worlds unlettered adults a figure, which has non progressed during the last decade (UNESCO, 2007). Girls development is affected by a variety of factors relating both to the demand and offer side of ontogenesis gender-stereotyped curricul a and teaching practices, nurture infrastructure non adapted to the necessitate of girls (lack of sepa order t embrocateets, enlighten fencing, girls boarding facilities, and so on) insecuritys for girls in effect(p)ty on the way to and at give lessonshouse (girls being abducted, at risk of rape at instill) or negatively charged socio-cultural practices (early marriage, low-toned lever given to training of girls). hotshot of the intimately significant obstacles to girls tuition is the restrain and prospect apostrophize of prepareing, which affects girls disproportionately. Girls from deplorable family lines register very low levels of indoctrinate finish in many countries (Bruns, Mingat, and Rakotomalala 2003).In India, for extype Ale, a nurture lay out that, amongst worthless girls, less than 10 share had consummate elementary teaching ( human body 8), compared to 85 part of rich boys (15-19 twelve months age group). didacticsal science of girls was consistently lower than for boys crossways all income groups (Filmer 1999). query from guinea cogitate that Family income or wealth is a bring out variable that explains exits in statemental opportunities and skill betwixt families. Poverty in a family will have a more than detrimental effect upon the decision to enrol a girl in school than boys (Tembon and Al-Samarrai 1997).This is linked to the fact that girls spend a significant amount of their epoch on seduce, oddly domestic chores and sylvan dig up. Their child work benefit for parents, and thus the opportunity be of their schooling, are thus greater than for boys. A survey in northerly India demonstrate that girls responsibility for domestic labour and for sibling care was by furthest the around important reason for not displace them to school or for their move out (The PROBE team 1999).A landing field from Bangladesh came to the following conclusion Normally, a sylvan Bangladeshi woman working 10 -14 hours a day, though most of this work is not visible or reflected in subject area statistics. The need to per row domestic chores to help their m an opposite(prenominal)s impedes girls fight in pro masterminda development, forcing them into ir tied(p) hanging and/or to surrender school (UNESCO 1998). In addition, there is try that direct educational salute are laid-backer for girls than for boys, for example because girls need safe transport to school or check school clothing to look gracious (Herz and Sperling 2004).Where women and girls have low societal spot, for shakeful parents are often more antipathetic to invest their meagre resources into the education of girls kind of than that of their sons. fare for teaching method (FFE) architectural plans school sustentation (school meals or snacks) and, peculiarly, the preparation of take home forage rations (THRs) have proven to be an trenchant means of addressing these obstacles, enrolling more gir ls in school, guardianship them enrolled, and enhancing their adulthood healthfulbeing and productivity as a result.In this paper we round the rationale behind FFE, particularly of THRs in meeting access to education for girls and resume the findings on the effectiveness of THR programs available in the published literature. We then complement the say with a case lead on a FFE political program in Pakistan designed to arrest girls education. Cost-effectiveness is central to policy-making on achieving gender equality in education to date, however, there are very a couple of(prenominal) studies that assess the be and follow-effectiveness of FFE programmes. The Pakistan case hire attempts to fill this orifice by analysing the constitute and benefits of the girls education programme. 2 design verbal description FFE programmes are encompassingspread in developing and higher income countries.In 2005 the UN humanity pabulum create by mental act supported FFE progra mmes in 74 countries, benefiting almost 22 million schoolchilds of whom 48 share girls. Some 3 million girls received dry, take-home nutrient rations in support of their education. take in fare rations typically consist of nutrition commodities that are of high value to families and part of their hackneyed aliment basket, such as cereals or veggie crude oil colour. They are distri neverthelessed periodical or quarterly nightimes, the distri merelyion time is as tumesce butt ended to the agricultural lean season, when family nutriment supplies are concluding and little pabulum available on the local anesthetic markets.Receipt of the food ration is occasional upon the students regular attending in the case of WFP-supported FFE programmes, for example, a minimum of 80 pct monthly attending rate is exactd. This helps to see to it that students subscribe to dressedt just enrol but essentially attend school regularly. FFE incumbrances are by and large desig ned to improve school affair amongst poor, vulnerable, food insecure populations and target areas where access to school and school extent are weak, particularly for girls.The risk of not accessing and/or completing primary school, a form of educational vulnerability anchored in spite of appearance a context of destitution and food insecurity, may be used to get the common characteristic shared by the children targeted by FFE. This idea reflects the reality that household choices regarding education are often a result of complex decision processes, where poverty and hunger play an important berth in determining the schooling offsprings (Dreze and Kingdon, 2001). As we have seen above, these factors are particularly significant in the case of girls education..In a general model of FFE (WFP, 2007), the initial outcome that drives profit school employment is the motivator to the household to send children to school. Generally, the inducing is achieved by way of an income tra nsfer to the family of the student and overly done an enhancement of the services provided at school (Bergeron & Del Rosso, 2001). FFE besides has an motivator effect on pupils actually wanting(p) to go to school to receive some food, rather than staying at home and absentminded out. Both of these effects will add together to shift, in the short-term, a households decision towards outgrowth schooling.The effects are most significant amongst poorest populations and where education, including girls education, is not well established. routine 1 summarises the main tinge theory for THRs and traces the causal links betwixt inputs and the desired educational outcome of change magnitude access, promotion and accomplishment for primary school children, particularly girls. Food for direction (FFE) programmes providing take-home rations are more fit to target individual students such as girls and less complex to action than conventional school meal programmes that require s ubstantial investment fundss both in term of infrastructure and conjunction inputs.For instance, THRs in the form of 4 litre vegetable oil cans are fairly easy to strain and distribute, and THR disseminations take place only erstwhile per month or less. More important, however, take-home food rations provide a more direct, higher value income transfer to families than school meals, which in turn provide the incentive for change magnitude school participation. From this perspective, THRs provide an immediate, income comprise benefit, and another long-term benefit stemming from the returns to increase education, serving as both preventative and promotive neighborly protection (Devereux and Sabates-Wheeler, 2004).On the other hand, THR are not suitable to address nutritional and health issues poignant school children and their education, particularly cognitive capacity, which is a well established outcome of school meals (Kristjansson et al. , 2007). 3 MDG 2&3 Improved at tendance Food Take-home rations distributed on agree of pupils regular attendance Targeted HHs received THRs on condition of their childrens regular attendance Incentive for HHs trim drop-out Increased scroll Better donnish performance Changing parents attitude regarding schooling.Figure 1 Food for teaching impact theory for take-home rations Impact of FFE programmes on girls education Evaluations of FFE programmes (see Adelman et al. , 2006) have shown that FFE programmes lead to change magnitude memorandum and attendance, of girls in particular, reduced dropout particularly in the lower primary school grades, and for on-site meals or snacks programmes improved student learning capacity. Literature infobases were searched to identify relevant studies on the physical and social benefits of FFE programmes to girls.The educational outcomes considered allow ind school participation (including inscription, attendance and drop-out). Primary school age children were the primary subjects of all the studies considered. Only one depicted object was found on the impact of THR programmes highlight the gap in evidence on this topic. Another paper was found on the comparative degree effects of the different modalities of FFE including THRs. One field-oriented valuation of a WFP FFE programme was likewise identified in Pakistan and this is include in the main body of this paper as a case reflect.In Bangladesh, IFPRI and the piece Bank mensurated the impact of a political sympathies FFE programme (Ahmed and Del Ninno, 2002) that covered over 2 million children in 2000. The instrument in FFE programme schools was found to have change magnitude by 35 pct over the deuce socio-economic class period between the programme start and after its frontmost yr. This increase was driven by a remarkable 44 percentage increase in girls register and by a 28 percent increase for boys. In non-programme schools enrolment change magnitude by 2. 5 percent (5. 4 for girls and 0. 1 for boys) during the same period.Attendance in FFE assisted schools was found to be 12 points higher than in non-assisted schools (70 percent compared to 58 percent individually). Drop-out range were similarly found to be 9 points lower in FFE assisted schools than in non-assisted schools (6 percent compared to 15 percent respectively). The overall programme embodys were reported to be US$0. 10 per child per day, though no digest of the make ups was provided. Another study analysed the comparative effects of the different modalities of FFE, including onsite meals combined with THRs (Gelli, Meir and Espejo, 2007).The results of this study of WFP admonishering and evaluation info showed that the purvey of the FFE programme contributed to increase secure registration in WFP-assisted schools by 28 percent for girls and 22 percent for boys in the premiere yr. Enrollment patterns after the world-class year varied according to the type of FFE program. Where provis ion of take-home rations for girls was combined with on-site nutriment for all pupils, the increase in girls absolute registration was Increased access, promotion & completion, particularly for girls 4 sustained at 30 percent after the initiative year.However, in schools providing on-site feed alone, the rate of increase in absolute enrollment after the first year reverted to the rates of increase found in the year prior to FFE implementation. The provision of take-home rations in addition appeared to reduce the dropout rate of young-bearing(prenominal) students, particularly in the higher grades. In addition, an analysis of WFP project expenditures in 2005 (Gelli, Al-Shaiba and Espejo, 2007) showed that the average cost of WFP THR programmes was US$29. 94 per child per year, the most expensive of FFE modalities.However, the cost driver for THR was in the main the large volume of food provided (72 percent of be programme costs, compared to 58 percent for school meal progr ammes). A study by Dreze and Kingdon from 2001 examined the effects of a wide range of determinants of school participation in rural northern India, focusing on school participation as a household decision. Amongst the school quality determinants, it was found that di rung school participation was roughly 15 percentage points higher when the local school provided a mid-day meal (MDM).Mid-day meals also were found to have a major(ip) positive effect on girls grade attainment chances of completing primary education were 30 percentage points higher for girls lifespan in a village with MDM. However, the MDM did not affect the enrolment of boys. The study confirm that female schooling is far more influenced by household economic status than boys schooling parents are not in the main opposed to female education but they are reluctant to pay for it. school day meals could make a big difference here by reducing the cliquish costs of schooling. An earlier study found that the noon mea l programme in Tamil Nadu in India attracted more girls to attend school and improved the attendance of those already in school (Devadas, 1983). The Pakistan Girls teaching political platform Data on womens participation in education in Pakistan shows low girls primary school net enrolment (59 percent) and female adult literacy rates (35 percent). Although female enrolment is increasing rapidly in all regions, girls participation rates at all levels are lower than that of boys and gender gaps persist, particularly in rural areas (WFP Pakistan, 2005).Since 1995, WFP has been providing food economic aid to support the efforts of the government of Pakistan (GoP) to improve access, retention and completion of girls primary education in 28 selected food-insecure districts of Pakistan, including sevensome districts of the pairing West Frontier Province (NWFP). The seven districts within the NWFP of Pakistan were identified by a WFP vulnerability analysis and mapping (VAM) study as b eing amongst the most food insecure areas in the country. Women and girls in these areas demonstrate huge barriers in terms of access to education.At the time when the project started, female literacy in rural areas was only slightly 10 percent and the primary participation rate of girls less than 30 percent. As a result, a take-home rations programme was introduced within these seven districts with the objective of increasing enrolment, retention and completion at girls primary schools. In 2005, THRs were provided monthly to 326,784 girls in 2,697 schools in vulnerable areas within 28 districts in the 5 responsiblenesss of Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and NWFP.Ration distribution was condition to regular school attendance. The monthly THRs consisted of a 4 litre tin of vegetable oil fortified with vitamin-A, and had an come closed value on the local market of US$5. execution Process Under the commonwealth course of study agreement signed by the Go P and WFP, WFP is accountable for providing the commodities for the FFE programme to the port of Karachi. The GoP is responsible for the food distribution to the 28 districts, as well as the concern of the timely tar of the food in good condition from all the district warehouses to the assisted schools. come across Implementation Units (PIUs) were trim up by the GoP in each assisted province to run the FFE programme. WFP provided a small transport for each district at the startle of the project to facilitate the logistics and implementation. However, because of the very toilsome terrain in the targeted low profile districts of NWFP, ensuring a timely 5 supply of the THRS to the schools has been challenging. As a result, many schools received the oil supply every(prenominal) second month or even later.Only two oil tins at the most, are distributed to a student to cover the back-log of non-supply during the previous period. At the school level, the head teacher generally recei ves the oil rations and supervises the distribution to the pupils, conditional to monthly attendance rates of at to the lowest degree 80 percent. The entitlement of each student is suss out a gather inst the school monthly attendance registers sooner the THR is distributed. The District component partrs Education & surrogate or benefactor District Officers also pay monitoring visits to the schools and verify this aspect.Programme costs Project expenditure data was reviewed in order to estimate the costs of the FFE programme. WFP reports annually on project expenditures, aboard other project statistics, in its standard project reports (SPRs). Expenditures are broken defeat into commodity, transport, landside transport shipping and handling (LTSH), other direct operational costs (ODOC), direct support costs (DSC) which added together form the direct project costs (DPC). A percentage of the DPC is then factored in as indirect support costs (ISC) to support WFP Headquarters. elude 1 presents a dislocation of total WFP expenditures in the country in 2005 alongside an estimate of the expenditure on the FFE programme, broken peck by WFP cost category. Table 1 2005 WFP total and estimated FFE expenditures in Pakistan inelegant Programme lend WFP Country Programme expenditures (USD) 11,667,043 970,358 0 90,856 621,934 874,879 14,225,070 Estimated school feeding expenditure (USD) 6,133,819 510,155 0 47,767 326,975 459,958 7,478,673 % FFE over total expenditures 82% 7% 0% 1% 4% 6% atomic number 6%.Commodities stock LTSH ODOC DSC ISC Total Regarding the brass contributions to the programme, the 2005 expenditures for each of the PIUs, dissever into direct and indirect expenditures, are shown in Table 2Table 1. Direct expenditures have been shared out into two parts i. e. (i) PIUs expenses which include staff salaries, renting of stores/warehouses, and other running expenses and (ii) the deportee Cost incurred on the transportation of oil from Karachi to respective districts/tehsils/schools.Indirect expenditures include the expenditures (adjusted by proportion of time spent on programme activities) of other staff members of governing body who manage the FFE programme i. e. distribute oil, monitor its distribution and send reports to PIUs from Districts / tehsils / schools level whose salaries are not charged to PIUs. These staff members include the Executive District Officers, District Education Officers (Female), Deputy District Education Officers, Assistant Education Officers, Store keepers, School Teachers and Peons etc.These expenditures have been calculated by WFP Pakistan establish on estimates following discussions with each respective PIU. As the entire FFE programme is managed by the provincial governments, PIU expenditures include all cost items required to deliver and manage the FFE programme. In 2005, school feeding activities accounted for 53 percent of food distributed in the whole WFP Country Programme. at that place were no further expenses incurred by the community in the running of the FFE programme. 6.Table 2 A breakdown of GoP budgeted expenses in 2004/2005 for FFE (THR) activities PIU Provinces Punjab Sindh Balochistan AJK* NWFP Total PKR 328,568 6,444,556 7,612,000 1,162,000 3,306,300 18,853,424 Direct Expenditures Transportation US$ PKR US$ 5,569 109,230 129,017 19,695 56,039 319,550 9,004,158 2,490,927 1,778,225 6,678,000 3,495,000 23,446,310 152,613 42,219 30,139 113,186 59,237 397,395 Indirect Expenditures PKR 22,984,227 23,795,400 20,183,829 25,194,939 92,158,395 US$ 389,563 403,312 342,099 427,033 1,562,007 PKR 32,316,953 32,730,883 29,574,054 7,840,000 31,996,239 134,458,129 Total US$ 547,745 554,761 501,255 132,881 542,309 2,278,951.Having collected estimates for the different costs that are associated with the FFE programme, from the procurement of food down to the distribution of the THRs to the school girls, we estimated the total cost of FFE in Pakistan for 2005. WFP an d GoP contributions for 2005 total $9,757,624 USD, and dividing this by the emergence of beneficiaries resulted in $29. 85 USD per school-girl per year. In 2005 in Pakistan, food costs accounted for approximately 63 percent of the total cost.The share of WFP expenses over the total cost was 77 percent, with the be share covered by the GoP. The cost per beneficiary increases to $63 USD per child per year if we adjust for full food distribution to all the planned beneficiaries, and assume arrant(a) attendance. Key outcomes and Impact.In 2004-2005, a set of surveys were carried out to assess educational and other socioeconomic programme outcomes (WFP Pakistan, 2005). The evaluation included the collection and analysis of detailed school-level records from all the 826 WFP-assisted schools and a set of 79 randomly selected non-assisted schools ( engage) in the region. A secondary study of the available literature (GoP, WFP, and other partners) and data was also undertaken, including an analysis of data from the Education Management Information System (EMIS) and in-depth interviews with various(a) partners twisty such as government, WFP officials, community members, parents, teachers and students.The evaluation showed that the programme had multiple benefits for girls education The overall enrolment at sampled schools increased by 135 percent between 1998/99 and 2003/04, whereas during the same period enrolment at control school increased by only 29 percent. There was a particularly strong increase in enrolment in the first grade of primary school (Kachi class) 211 percent at programme schools, compared to 5 percent in control school. This indicates that the programme was particularly prospering in stimulating enrolment of girls who, until then, had never entered a school. On average, 88 percent of students attended school for 20 or more geezerhood per month (and were thus eligible for the take-home ration).Despite the positive effects on enrolment and att endance, completion of primary school stiff a problem. Out of every 100 female students enrolling in 1998/99, only 44 percent reached grade 5. Although the primary school completion rate improved to 47 percent for the cohort starting school in 1999/2000, this only reflected a national trend, and programme schools actually showed worse results than control schools. This shows that the effect of the food incentive is not sufficiently strong to ensure that girls stay in school as they get older, and older girls of the family might be replaced by their younger siblings. 7 The programme also broke new ground and increased sense of girls education.Before the programme started, 48 percent of households did not send any of their daughters to school now all parents tutor at least one daughter. achieverion 38 percent of respondents said that the food incentive was the only reason for sending their daughter to school, 29 percent they would get over educating their daughters even if the programme stopped. 27 percent said that general hostility to girls education in the community was no longish an issue. The food incentive was much comprehended by the families and provided them with tangible benefits. 32 percent of community members interviewed said that their income had increased, generating savings in the family budget and that they had more free time for agricultural activities or business.Costs and benefits of the FFE programme A basic textile was substantial by WFP in order to evaluate the cost and benefits of the FFE intervention designed to support girls education (Espejo et al. , 2006). In this model, the benefits from FFE are fictive to consist of two components the first is the fiscal value of expected lifespan surplus earnings after successful completion of primary school, whilst the second is the market value of a monthly take-home ration, provided on condition to a girls school attendance by dint ofout the programme duration. If we apply th is cost-benefit framework to the FFE programme in Pakistan the results show that every USD spent on the FFE yields approximately 1. 68 USD in benefits.An alternative to estimating the benefits of education through the monetary value of expected lifetime special earnings after successful completion of primary school is to estimate the extra school old age gained through the effect of a particular intervention aimed at increasing school participation. Comparisons of actual pupil attendance days to the pure(a) attendance day total can provide a single bar of school participation that encompasses enrolment, drop-out and absenteeism, the three main educational outcomes linked to FFE.A round-eyed model developed to estimate the gain in pupil attendance days in FFE schools using averages for attendance, drop-out and enrolment resulted in an estimated 25 extra school days per child per year (WFP, 2007). This translates into approximately $240 USD per additional year of schooling for gir ls in Pakistan. The cost and effects of the THR programme are summarised in Table 3.Table 3 Estimated measures of cost-effectiveness of THRs in Pakistan (Source WFP Pakistan 2005, WFP SSFS 2003). Enrolment Effect (per year) Cost 22% increase Education Attendance 10% increase Drop-out 5% decrease 25 extra school days per year per pupil 30-60 USD per child per year Lessons learnt Of all the programmes initiated in NWFP, this one has do the most visible impact.It has contributed a lot in this province Fazle Manan, Director of Schools and Literacy from the Ministry of Education, when asked of WFPs assistance to girls primary education. The FFE programme triggered a label increase in enrolment of girls in assisted schools in Pakistan. The enrolment more than doubled during the first three age of intervention.These types of incentives and awareness campaigns are imperative to advertize girls education, to improve female literacy and reduce the gender gap, especially in remote rural ar eas. However, the retention of girl students in the school system and further improvement of the participation rate is essential to achieve commonplace primary education. 8 As a result of the increased enrolment, the nearly lift school buildings have become more used, providing a better return of investment to the community and the government. However, the quality of education, itself a major incentive for sending children to school, has been constrained by the lack of teachers.Moreover, many of the assisted schools bide from a want of adequate facilities, including furniture, water, sanitation, and point of accumulation walls. This issue highlights the need to ensure that erst children are in school, efforts are made to enhance the learning environment, as well as to support pupil attendance and retention. The involvement of the community and the local government has been essential to mobilise the resources necessary for meliorate the school infrastructure. The FFE project ha s raised the awareness among the assisted communities closely the importance of educating girls. yet the most reluctant parents are now sending their daughters to school.This change in attitude is a remarkable doing against the screen background of the social and cultural taboos that had prohibited the education of girls in the past. The mothers of the girl students now get out of their homes and visit schools to wonder about the progress of their daughters. Most of the females in distributed rural areas were previously not allowed to tonicity outside their homes now girls are issue to schools and their elderly female relatives visit schools to enquire about the attendance, progress in studies and potential dates of supply of oil. This change in social attitude and behaviour is an important achievement of the programme. Future plans The impact of the THR programme in supporting access to education for girls in rural, food insecure areas of Pakistan has been remarkable.Though WFP was involved in the design, management and implementation the FFE intervention, the self-control of the overall programme was, through the var. of the programme, handed over to the Government of Pakistan. As of 2005, project implementation units staffed with senior level Government officials took-over the full responsibility of the programme in terms of food auction pitch to schools, programme monitoring and reporting. Financial contributions from the Government of Pakistan have also been essential to the success of the programme to date. The successful hand-over of the programme management will be critical to ensure the sustainability of the FFE programme in the future. 9 References Adelman S, Gilligan DO, Lehrer K. (2006).A review of the economics of Food for Education programs. transnational Food Policy Research contribute. Ahmed AU, Del Ninno C. (2002) Food for Education program in Bangladesh an evaluation of its impact on educational attainment and food security. Food use and Nutrition Division, Discussion Paper 138. International Food Policy Research form Bruns B, Mingat A, Rakotomalala R. (2003) Achieving Universal Primary Education by 2015 A Chance for Every Child. Washington, D. C, orb Bank. Del Rosso J. (1999) School Feeding Programmes Improving intensity and Increasing the Benefit to Education. A subscribe to for Programme Managers. Devadas RP. (1983).The Honorable Chief attends Nutritious Meal Programme for Children of Tamil Nadu. Coimbatore, India Sri Arinashilingam Home Service College Devereux S, Sabates-Wheeler R. (2004) Transformative complaisant Protection, Working Paper 232, Brighton work of education Studies. Dreze J, Kingdon G. (2001) School Participation in Rural India. Review of Development Economics. 2001 5 (1), 1-24. Espejo F, Gabriele A, Gelli A. and Knips V. (2006) Submitted. Evaluating Food for Education Programmes A hard-nosed Approach. International Journal of educational Development. Gelli A, Al-Shaiba N, Espe jo F. Estimating the cost of Food for Education Interventions. 2007.Filmer D. (1999) Educational attainment and enrolment profiles A resource harbour based on analysis of demographic and health survey data Development Research Group Washington DC, foundation Bank Herz B, Sperling G. (2004) What flora in girls education exhibit and policies from the developing world. New York, Council on Foreign Relations Kristjansson EA, Robinson M, Petticrew B, MacDonald J, Krasevec L, Janzen T, Greenhalgh G, Wells J, MacGowan A, farmer A, Shea BJ, Mayhew A and Tugwell P (2007) School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged elementary school children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews wages 1.Tembon M, Al-Samarrai S. (1997) Who gets primary schooling and why? Evidence of gender inequalities within families in Guinea IDS Working Paper 85 Brighton, Institute of Development Studies The PROBE Team (1999) commonplace Report on Basic Education in India Ne w Delhi, Oxford University Press coupled Nations Childrens Fund, World Food Programme. The inwrought Package. Twelve interventions to improve the health and nutrition of school-age children. WFP, 2005. United Nations Educational scientific and cultural Organisation. Education For All planetary supervise Report. Strong Foundations. UNESCO, 2007. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation.Education for All Global Monitoring Report. The Leap to Equality. UNESCO, 2004. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation Bridging the gap between intention and action Girls and womens education in South-Asia. Bangkok, UNESCO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 1998. World Bank. From Schooling Access to reading Outcomes An Unfinished Agenda World Bank, 2006 World Food Programme Pakistan. Situation abstract WFPs Assistance to Girls Primary Education in selected districts of NWFP. WFP Pakistan, 2005. World Food Programme. Food for Education works a review of WFP FFE monitoring and evaluation 2002-2006. WFP 2007. 10.