Legacy of Algeria

Algeria take a breathers one of Frances close to valuable possessions during the compound period. The country was a french colony for over a speed of light until the early 1960s when nationalist agitation caused independence to be give-up the ghost to the country. This form of revolt, which began gathering momentum in 1954 and lasted till 1962, is what became known as the Algerian War. Even though this contendfare ended since 1962, the memories of the War are still present especially in France. to a greater extentover, this war appears to be the close to significant spell of Frances involvement in Algeria.This essay impart therefore look at the legacy created in France as a result of their involvement in Algeria. The essay will also attend the huge debates and controversies created by memories of the war in France. Aspects of brutality by the cut police will equally be examined.Torture was a significant part of the Algerian and this aspect has sparked a series of deba tes and controversies in France perpetually since the war ended. During the more than one hundred thousand Algerians were tortured1 by European born(p) cut police officers and pro- french Algerians who had been known to be very brutal when they handled matters relating to French Algerians in genus Paris. Several interrogation centers were created and the torture of Algerians by French assistant police was synonymous to these interrogation centers. Methods used where water torture, impaling on bottles and galvanic shocking.2 It was incidents like these that made the Algerian War to be labeled the most brutal in all colonial battles that France got involved in. In fact the conduct of the war welcomed a hand of criticisms from the French public without scour bordering active the goals of the war. It is therefore no surprising that French men termed the war, mucky war.3Torture was so common to the extent that General Paul Aussaresses, whom at the time of the war was working wi th the French Special Service in Algeria and who took part in the battle of Algiers, which was aimed at hunting and destroying Algerian fighters declare the use of torture when he held that,Among the operations in which I participated, most led to interrogations.Others to simple liquidation, which occurred on the spot. . . . Those whoarrived in Tourelles an interrogation center were considered to be soguilty that they did not leave alive. . . . Torture was used systematically ifthe prisoner refused to talk, which was give outs the case. Rarely were prisonerswho were interrogated at night alive in the morning. If they talked ornot,they were generally neutralized. . . . analysis executions were an integralpart of the task of maintaining order4The employment of torture by French police in the Algerian war created a significant restore in France, years after the War was over. To begin with, it sparked up a huge debate in France and the issue was whether torture was used during the Algerian war. This debate has been going ever since the war ended. For instance, in 1979, the issue about torture became so popular, to then that public opinion had to be sampled to mold those who believed that torture was part of Frances colonial rule in Algeria. More than 50% of opinions sampled confirmed that they believe torture had been part and parcel of the Algerian crisis.5 In later year the issue received more wisdom to the extent that, opinion polls showed 94% of the population holding the look that torture had been employed by French police during the Algerian War.The legacy left behind by the Algerian had serious ramifications in French politics. The question on torture again received recognition for the quality it played during presidential campaigns in France. This was the case of the presidential elections in France in France in 2002. During campaigns major candidates were demanded to justify their stance with regards to the use of torture Algerian war.6 Majority of the candidates in this case were out rightly against torture.7 In fact, ever since the war ended, the manner in which the war was handled has always aroused criticisms with ferocity comed on the use of torture. How ever, it is important to understand that French citizens stand neer really knockd the motive behind their involvement in Algeria. Instead, they criticize the manner in which the organisation reacted when things started going wrong in Algeria.The Algerian case also left it trade mark in the efficacious department in France. This is because, years after the incident, some of the perpetrators of what has been considered as ignoble acts commence been brought before the court. Moreover, trials of this kind have drawn a lot of attention from the press. A case in point is the trial of Maurice Papon, who was the brainchild behind the suppression of Algerian demonstrators. Papon was a government functionary in Frances possessions in North Africa during the 1940s and 5 0sThis case was presided over in Bordeaux by Jean Louis Castagnds.8During this trial, Papon asserted that he was never in support of the use of torture. He pointed out the he was never in control of the military, the main perpetrators of these acts, therefore, there was little he could do to grab them.9 Even though Papon was freed for medical reasons, this case went further to strengthen the legacy of the Algerian situation in France. For instance the case pushed writers to work and in the process a number of whole kit on Papon were produced. General works were also written on Papon and his trial. wiz of such works was marc Olivier Bruchs scholarly study of the French administration under Vichy, titled pepper Servir lEtat Francaise.On the commercial-grade level some of these works gained a lot of grounds. This could be seen in the steady variety of books, movies and television shows, which came out to patron bring to light the degree of torture experienced during the Algerian adventure. One of these movies, perhaps the most commercially successful, titled Avoir Vingt ans dans lAures released in 1971 and the nonsubjective La Guerre dAlgerie and a lot of other documentary revealed the hidden practices of the of the French army in Algeria.10In fact Pascal Ory has tested to summarize central theme underlying most of the French movies and documentaries on the Algerian war when hen he writes, French cinema did everything it could to give the image of the Algerian War as a dirty war Also, another history of French movies holds the position that Torture obsesses the cinema of the Algerian War.11 Most of these movies and documentaries have gained a lot of grounds on the commercial level.Another legacy left by the Algerian war in France has been the commemorations in France marking the 1961 massacre. This incident occurred when dozens of Algerians were peacefully marching in Paris on October 17 1961. These of Algerians were ruthlessly killed. During the early y ears of the French government acknowledged the need for regular commemorations to mark this incident. The most outstanding was that held on the occasion of the 40th anniversary. This event was commemorated with demonstrations, exhibitions, film showings, and a colloquium held in the issue Assembly, with distinguished panelists and some of the survivors of the event.12The legacy created by the Algerian questions in France has created a lot of controversy in France. For instance, national petition came demanding that the 1961 massacre be labeled a crime against pityingity. This petition was welcomed by many dexterous elites amongst them were Pierre Bourdieu, Maurice Agulhon, Madeleine Rbrioux, Jacques Derrida. Such calls pushed the Paris City Council to hang on a organisation on the fish Bridge where several Algerians were dumped in to the river Seine on the day of demonstration. It even took time before the finale on what was to be written on the plaque. The wordings were carv ed on the plaque affixed on the left bank of the bridge crossing River Seine To the memory of all the Algerians killed during the bloody repression of the peaceful demonstration of 17 October1961.13 numerous human right groups and leftist have also welcomed the position that that the massacre be considered a crime against humanity.Another area of controversy in the Algerian crisis is centered on the proper word to term it. The French never wanted to consider it a war, instead they less hard phrases such a move to maintain order have always been preferred. However, a new understanding stemming from the rising mentions of the occurrences during the conflict made the French sevens in 1999 to label the Algerian case a war. This new education seems to have weakened the stance of many with regards to the horrors of the conflict.14 This indicates the strike created by the Algerian crisis in France if one considers the fact that the conflict has been a call for concern right in the Fre nch Assembly.Another area of controversy has been on the impact of trials like the case of Maurice Papon. People have been asking questions on whether it is needful to try somebody for a crime committed some cubic decimeter years back. The French government sees it different. For instance, France which is one of those countries championing the course of democracy and human has to do something keep her credibility towards these this course.Moreover, it is imperative for trials of this kind to take place so that they could act as preventive measure for those who ever bring out their self in situations like the case in Algeria.Above all, there has also been a huge debate on the impact trials of this kind could have at the level of pedagogy.From the above, it is clear that the Algerian question has left a big scar on the French society judging from the memories of the war, which keeps spread in France and among French people and Algerians. Moreover, some people still remain divided on certain aspects of the war and it is this situation that has sparked up controversies when public lecture about the Algerian war.ReferenceCohen, William B. The Algerian War and the Revision of Frances afield Mission.Project Muse.Golsan, Richard J. Vichy hereafter History and Counter History in postwar France.Lincoln and London University of Nebraska Press, 2000.1 William B. Cohen, The Algerian War and the Revision of Frances abroad Mission, Project Muse, 228. 2 Richard J. Golsan, Vichy Afterlife History and Counter History in Postwar France (Lincoln and London University of Nebraska Press, 2000), 167. 3 Cohen, The Algerian War , 229. 4 Ibid, 232. 5 Ibid, 230. 6 Ibid, 236. 7 Ibid. 8 Golsan, Vichy Afterlife, 158. 9 Ibid, 162. 10 Cohen, The Algerian War , 229 11 Ibid, 229. 12 Ibid, 234. 13 Ibid, 235. 14 Cohen 231